The survey results are in, and as I promised, I will be reporting the findings. In this post I will outline areas that need improvement and areas where we’re currently doing well.
My Performance as Main Owner
Areas where I’m performing well:
- Staff are able to comfortably report issues to me.
- Reports are usually spread on a need-to-know basis.
- I have an apparent interest in solving reported issues.
- Changes to the chat are well-communicated.
- Issues with staff drama are well-handled.
Areas where I need improvement:
- Although the results leaned toward “perfect amount of leniency” when dealing with other staff members who violate rules or need some sort of intervention, the results indicate that some improvement could be made in this area (average rating: 3.53; 5 is best).
- I am not active enough (average rating: 2.65; 5 is best).
Performance of Owners
Areas where owners are performing well:
- Owners appear to effectively handle reports that need to be passed to the main owner.
Areas where owners need improvement:
- Although responses varied, owners could do a little better in solving issues reported to them (average rating: 3.76; 5 is best).
- In general, owners get a low C for professionalism (average rating: 7.06/10). While this may not be an effective method for determining professionalism (some critics may say it’s best to evaluate it on an individual level), it’s important that the team of owners is considered professional.
- In general, I expect owners to act a little more professional. I shouldn’t need to explain what this entails, so I won’t. If I see issues with it, I’ll correct it. If issues with professionalism are reported to me, I’ll deal with it then too.
Points of Interest
- With an average rating of 3.76 (5 is best), some work needs to be done with the promotion of guests. Perhaps there are people helping as guests who do not get noticed, or they do get noticed and it takes too long for them to get promoted.
- Although all members have to be approved by me personally, it only takes one owner to suggest someone to become a member. I am actually open to moderators suggesting new members too. I have a general disliking for situations where guests become temporary moderators, only to be demoted back to guest once their time as moderator has expired. For this reason, I prefer to make someone a member if they are trusted with the powers that a moderator has.
- It is the average perception that members are promoted to moderator in a timely fashion. However, there have been some complaints about the time that it takes to become a moderator. For example, there was recently some frustration involving a member who had been a member for a long time but had not yet been promoted to moderator. In this instance, it was not brought to my attention.
- I feel that a little work needs to be done in this area: (a) If an owner feels that someone should be promoted, they should tell me about it; (b) I will start keeping track of the dates when people become member and will use this list in addition to the member’s activity level to determine if a promotion to moderator is necessary.
- We need to make helping the number one priority.
- If you are having a general conversation with others while someone needs help, focus on sending fewer messages until all users have been helped. You may encounter situations in which one staff member is helping an individual and users are having a general conversation. The messages from the general, off-topic conversation may “flood” the chat in some sense, causing the important messages (meant to help the user) to be missed by the person who needs help. This means that it’s not always appropriate to carry on a conversation even if someone is being helped. We need to make sure that people are being helped, and that they are seeing the messages meant to help them.
- I will continue to not make blog posts about people who are promoted.
- I will try to make more blog posts to keep everyone in the loop.